Thanks for sharing another viewpoint, Michael! I agree with you that it was creative, and I also agree that it was a representation of a very old tale – but it was a representation I didn’t like at all. My opinion does not come from a biblical standpoint (I’m far from a biblical scholar, not even close!), but a combination of story-telling taste and in my opinion, an unappealing and unnecessary visual license taken by combining cheap-looking science-fiction elements with an otherwise “epic” backdrop. That there may have been giants back then, I have no problem believing. That they were considered fallen angels, I get. That Noah may have gone a bit mad is also in the realm of possibility. But how it all came together in this film was, for me, disturbing both artistically and intellectually. It didn’t tie together well. I expected strife, conflict, intensity, even perhaps a sense of supernatural, but not whatever oddity this was, good acting aside!… But that all said, I really do appreciate your thoughts. They added some balance here!

But you are right with one thing,you should be better informed about what the director intended to do and not what the world expected to see. The movie was very creative, and it is very hard to get and swallow. But people are accepting harder and harder other points of view. Plus, the actors really played well.

Beautifully stated, Dyer! Thank you for that eloquence of thought.